Legal Opinion

Zielinski v. Harding

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is the return of a notice of motion therein designated as an application for a peremptory order of review and mandamus.

This is not a taxpayer’s action under section 51 of the General Municipal Law, and counsel for petitioner disavows any such suggestion. Under the facts alleged in the petition, and in the failure upon the part of petitioner to conform to the statute, the proceeding could not be designated as a statutory taxpayer’s action. (Gen. Mun. Law, § 51; Talcott v. City of Buffalo, 125 N. Y. 280; Ziegler v. Chapin, 126 id. 342.) Petitioner has made his application under article 78…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Talcott v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MandevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Jordan v. LoosNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. New York Post Corp. v. LeibowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API