Legal Opinion

Tatum v. City of Hallandale

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 19, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

71 So.2d 495 (1954)

TATUM

v.

CITY OF HALLANDALE et al.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

March 19, 1954.

James W. Moore and Frank F. Cosgrove, Miami, for appellant.

James M. Crum and McCune, Hiaasen & Kelley, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

DREW, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a complaint to enjoin enforcement of Ordinance No. 181 of the City of Hallandale, Florida, the pertinent sections of which ordinance read as follows:

"Section 8. No person shall make any exhibition flights by carrying banners on, distribute circulars from, or operate loud speaking device from any aircraft…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. All American Airways, Inc. v. Village of Cedar-HurstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Messer v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. S. S. Pike Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Harris v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olan Mills, Inc. v. Panama CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Foley v. City of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API