Legal Opinion
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Neuville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 5, 1991No. C7-90-1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent Horace Mann Insurance Company (Company) brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that appellant Eric Neuville was occupying an uninsured motor vehicle at the time of his injuries. Therefore, he is precluded from asserting coverage under a policy issued by Company. The parties stipulated to the facts, and both moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Compa ny s motion for summary judgment, and Neuville has appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was injured in an automobile accident on September 26, 1986. Appellant had been driving a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Day v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Klein v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Balderrama v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cuevas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Allied Mutual Insurance Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Christensen v. General Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Gieser v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Benike v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.