Legal Opinion
Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 5, 1980No. 78-1327PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, Rosenthal & Company, applies to this court for review of an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or Commission). The petitioner maintains, inter alia, that the CFTC’s order was entered without jurisdiction and in violation of its own regulations, that the method adopted by the CFTC for determining the legal sufficiency of complaints in reparation proceedings is at variance with the Administrative Procedure Act as well as with the requirements of due process of law, and that the complained of actions by the CFTC are inherently irrational,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Robert F. Haltmier v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Oficina de la Procuradora del Paciente v. Aseguradora MCS, IPA 603Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2004
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Myron v. ChicoineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Myron v. HauserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.