Hicks v. Barrow

REGAN, Judge.

The plaintiff, William Hicks, filed this suit against the defendant, William Barrow, endeavoring to recover the sum of $25,428.50, representing damages for personal injuries and medical expenses which he asserts were incurred as the result of being attacked and bitten by the defendant’s vicious dog.

The defendant answered and denied that he was negligent in knowingly permitting a dog possessed of a vicious temperament to be kept on his premises.

Frotn a judgment in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has prosecuted’ this appeal.

The record discloses that on the afternoon of June…