Matter of Tillman

Respondent violated Rule 1.16(a)(3) of Rule 407, SCACR, by continuing to represent a client who had discharged him and by improperly asserting a common-law retaining lien on her file. We impose a public reprimand.

FACTS

Clients hired respondent in September 1991 following an automobile accident in June 1991. They executed a written contract: it provided for a contingent fee of 33% or 40% depending on whether there was trial preparation. Alternatively, it provided for an hourly fee of $105/hour if the attorney was discharged prior to settlement or verdict.

On June 18, 1993, client called…