Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1988No. Appeal No. 1621 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

Petitioner, James E. Brooks, seeks review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referees decision denying unemployment compensation benefits to him based on a finding of willful misconduct under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.

Petitioner was last employed by Empire Kosher as a laborer. He had been under the care of a chiropractor for back problems and had been off work because of this *352back problem. He returned to work on February 26, 1987, at 6:00 a.m., his usual starting time,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Waltz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Goodman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. O. Dobryk v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API