Reynolds v. Fry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action by a broker to recover a commission allegedly earned in procuring a real estate loan for defendant. Trial to the court without a jury resulted in judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
There is evidence to the effect that defendant by oral agreement employed plaintiff to procure a loan for him, for which service plaintiff was to receive a specified commission. Plaintiff solicited a Mr. Harris, who declined to make the loan for the reason that he was without sufficient funds at the time. Later, Harris, through his exclusive efforts, obtained a loan from a relative…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Abraham v. WasaffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- H. B. Davidson v. R. M. Vandegrift, F. B. Meyer and Gibraltar Oil Company, a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Fish v. HannaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941