Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Fry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1940No. 29414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action by a broker to recover a commission allegedly earned in procuring a real estate loan for defendant. Trial to the court without a jury resulted in judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

There is evidence to the effect that defendant by oral agreement employed plaintiff to procure a loan for him, for which service plaintiff was to receive a specified commission. Plaintiff solicited a Mr. Harris, who declined to make the loan for the reason that he was without sufficient funds at the time. Later, Harris, through his exclusive efforts, obtained a loan from a relative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Abraham v. WasaffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. B. Davidson v. R. M. Vandegrift, F. B. Meyer and Gibraltar Oil Company, a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  2. Fish v. HannaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API