State v. Lundquist
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Gregory Lundquist appeals his convictions by a juiy of possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and felony obstruction of official duty. On appeal, Lundquist contends that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the elements of possession of marijuana. We disagree and affirm. In addition, Lundquist maintains that his convictions for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia were multiplicitous. We disagree and affirm. Finally, Lundquist contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of felony obstruction of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. FikeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- State v. VontressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. GarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- State v. SheldonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.