McKithen v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
UNDERHILL, District Judge:
This case presents the question whether the Constitution provides individuals convicted in New York the right to obtain post-conviction access to the State’s evidence for DNA testing. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John Gleeson, District Judge), confronting the question as a matter of first impression on remand from this Court, held that such a right exists under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the plaintiff-appellee was constitutionally entitled to receive evidence for the purpose of post-conviction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Alvarez v. Attorney General for Fla.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Gabriele v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.