Legal Opinion

McKithen v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 19, 2010No. Docket 08-4002-prPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNDERHILL, District Judge:

This case presents the question whether the Constitution provides individuals convicted in New York the right to obtain post-conviction access to the State’s evidence for DNA testing. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John Gleeson, District Judge), confronting the question as a matter of first impression on remand from this Court, held that such a right exists under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the plaintiff-appellee was constitutionally entitled to receive evidence for the purpose of post-conviction…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Alvarez v. Attorney General for Fla.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Gabriele v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API