Legal Opinion · Dissent

Acom v. Ziegler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1918No. 19975Published

Appeal from the district court for Dodge county: .Frederick W. Button, Judge.

1DissentHamer, J.

I am unable to agree with' tke views expressed in the majority opinion. Tke marriage took place March 18, 1916. Tke judgment was not rendered until tke 3d day of June, 19Í6, two and one-kalf months after-wards. Tke mere fact tkat a case was pending against tke prospective husband would confer- no lien upon *418the land. Besides, there were other defendants in the case. The case might be continued or compromised or settled. The other defendants, might pay in case a judgment should be rendered. I see nothing to prevent Mrs. Acom from getting a good title to the land which her husband promised to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Same v. SameNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McMahon v. SpeilmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Van Doren v. WiedemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API