Arado v. Arado

This writ of error brings up for review a proceeding wherein plaintiff in error’s bill for divorce was dismissed for want of equity and a decree annulling the marriage between the parties was entered on defendant’s cross-bill.

The pleadings admitted that the complainant, Elizabeth Arado, and the defendant, David Arado, entered into a ceremonial marriage on October 4, 1894, and for many years thereafter lived together and cohabited as' man and wife; that, as the fruits of the said marriage, two children were born to them, both of whom are still living; that complainant and defendant were…