Succession of Bedford
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Tenth District Court, Parish of Red River. Hall, J. Since the revision of the Civil Code and Statutes, in 1870, there has been no law in force, autliorizizing the appointment of a provisional administrator, with the exception of Act 87 of 1870, creating the office of public administrator, excepting the parish of Orleans, same was repealed by Act 74 of 1877. 30 Ann, 101, Succession of J"ohn Ciarle.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Tenth District Court, Parish of Red River. Hall, J. Since the revision of the Civil Code and Statutes, in 1870, there has been no law in force, autliorizizing the appointment of a provisional administrator, with the exception of Act 87 of 1870, creating the office of public administrator, excepting the parish of Orleans, same was repealed by Act 74 of 1877. 30 Ann, 101, Succession of J"ohn Ciarle. IX, Upon tbe applicant’s own showing, he should have ceen required to give bond for §25,000 K. C. C. 1127,1048. III. An appeal lies from an order appointing, as well as from an order…
1Opinion of the Court
*245Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Porin':. J.
This appeal is a sequel of tl)e question just decided in the case of A. A. Farmer vs. W. C. Hafley, No. 9446, on the docket of this Court, and reference is made to that decision for a full statement of the facts which have a bearing on both cases.
After the finality of the judgment which purported to remove TIafley from the functions of administrator of the succession of Seth Bedford, Farmer asked and obtained an order appointing him provisional administrator of that succession on a bond of one hundred dollars.
This appeal is…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Gelpi v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Succession of LecompteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940