Alpental Community Club, Inc. v. Seattle Gymnastics Society
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Cox, A.C.J.
The right-to-farm act bars nuisance actions against those engaged in “forest practices” where such practices were established prior to surrounding nonforestry activities.1 The bar is subject to the further condition that the activity not have a substantial adverse effect on the public health and safety.2 The trial court made no express determination that the activities here had such a substantial adverse impact on the public health and safety. And the growing of timber on the property of Seattle Gymnastics Society (SGS) antedated the establishment of the nonforestry activities of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Woodruff v. McClellanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LPWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders Ltd. PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Department of Natural Resources v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alpental Community Club, Inc. v. Seattle Gymnastics SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Alpental Community Club v. SgsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Alpental Community Club, Inc. v. SGSWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Alpental Community Club, Inc. v. Seattle Gymnastics SocietyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004