Legal Opinion

State v. Yapo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 2009No. A09A0614PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a pre-trial evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Alain Yapo was immune from prosecution under OCGA § 16-3-24.2 for two battery charges brought by the State, which immunity was based on a court finding that Yapo was acting in self-defense. The State appeals. Because we hold that evidence supported the finding of the trial court, we affirm.

Construed in favor of the trial court’s ruling, the evidence shows that Yapo and his girlfriend disagreed over which of them should be driving Yapo’s car after a stop at a gas station. The girlfriend finally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Fair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Bunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hipp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. BunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Mullins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API