Weisel v. . Cobb
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, heard before Oreen, J., on the report of a Referee, at Fall Term, 1895, of Pasquotank Superior Court. Various exceptions of the plaintiff, some of which are referred to in the opinion of Associate Justice MONTGOMERY, were overruled and plaintiff appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery, J.:
Upon the dissolution of the partnership composed of S. Weisel & Son, the son being Moses Weisel, the plaintiff in this action, by the death of 5. Weisel, it appears that the surviving partner, the plaintiff, was told by the defendant, who knew that the plaintiff was a partner of his deceased father, that the best thing and the only thing for the plaintiff to do was to administer upon his father’s estate, or get someone else to do so. The plaintiff on June 14, 1886, called upon the clerk of the superior court to qualify, as administrator of the-deceased father, and offered a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weisel v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- United States National Bank v. National Bank of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- U.S. Nat'l Bank v. Nat'l Bank of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Hood ex rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937