Legal Opinion
Roos v. Dale
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1970No. 3029PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRUGÉ, Judge.
This is an action for attorney fees allegedly due on a contract between plaintiff, a law partnership, and defendant. The defendant moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals.
On October 4, I960, Roos & Roos, a partnership consisting of two attorneys, entered into a written contract with defendant, whereby plaintiff was to represent defendant in her efforts to obtain an interest in the succession of her deceased husband. The pertinent part of the contract concerning plaintiff’s remuneration is as follows:
“TERMS OF AGREEMENT
“In consideration…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roy & Roy v. RiddleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Texas Co. v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Delta Equipment and Constr. Co. v. Royal Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Stack v. De Soto Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation v. MaggioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carter v. BRMAPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- First Nat. Bank v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Crocker v. LevyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Martin v. Lafayette Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- CALCASIEU-MARINE NAT. BANK OF LAKE CHARLES v. DarlingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.