Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In error.

1Opinion of the Court

AN indictment against a constable under the 48th section of the act relative to crimes and punishments, R. C. 1831, p. 190, for official negligence in not executing a state’s warrant, need not contain an averment that the justice who issued the warrant had legal authority to do so; nor an allegation, that previously to the issuing of the warrant, a complaint on oath was made to the justice charging the person to be arrested

with the commission of a crime; nor that a crime was committed in the view of the justice.

It is sufficient if the indictment, in such case, set out a warrant legal upon its…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Lane v. InnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Williams v. HitzieIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Moore v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Cleaveland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API