Legal Opinion

Claim of Volinsky v. Reliable Waste & Rag Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Claimant has been denied an award of compensation on the ground that no accident was established within the meaning and intent of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The main facts surrounding the occurrence which led to his disability were established beyond question. He was. employed as a rag sorter. On the day of the occurrence an official of his employer accidentally stepped into an opening in the floor through which bales of rags were hoisted and fell to the floor below. Claimant and another employee dashed to his assistance, and in doing so were required to descend a stairway at the bottom…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Volinsky v. Reliable Waste & Rag Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Claim of Volinsky v. Reliable Waste & Rag Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API