Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of Mohawk Associates & Furlough, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 23, 1995No. Civ. A. MJG-94-3198PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARBIS, District Judge.
The Court has before it Claimants Timothy and Suzanne Smiths’ Motion to Dissolve Order Enjoining Suits (the “Motion to Dissolve”) and the materials submitted by the parties relating thereto. The Court finds that a hearing is unnecessary.
As discussed more fully herein, the Court will grant the Claimants’ requested relief because:(1) The only objecting party lacks standing to oppose the motion, and(2) The stipulations provided by the Claimants are adequate to protect the shipowners’ right of limited liability.
I. BACKGROUND
Claimants Timothy Smith, Individually, and Timothy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lake Tankers Corp. v. HennSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dammers & Vanderheide Scheepvaart Maats Christina v. CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Odeco Oil and Gas Company, Drilling Division and Odeco Drilling Services, Inc. v. David J. BonnetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Gorman v. CerasiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beiswenger Enterprises Corp. v. CarlettaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- In Re the Complaint of McAllister Towing of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- In Re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006
- In re Complaint of Campbell Transportation Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013
- Chesapeake Marine Tours, Inc. v.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.