Legal Opinion

Tan May Yen v. Ko Cheuk Yin

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 20, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01565Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 TAN MAY YEN, 7 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01565-BAT 8 v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND 9 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW KO CHEUK YIN, 10 Defendant. 11 12 On September 24, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Tan May Yen commenced this

17 U.S.C. § 501

13 copyright infringement action against pro se Defendant Ko Cheuk Yin. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff alleges 14 that Defendant’s product (the “Accused Work”) infringed Plaintiff’s copyrighted work “Excel 15 Shortcut Keys Mouse Pad” (the “Copyrighted Work”). Dkt. 5 (“Complaint”). 16 In earlier orders, the Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Flexible Lifeline Systems., Inc. v. Precision Lift, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API