Legal Opinion
Maersk Tankers MR K/S v. M/T SWIFT WINCHESTER (IMO No. 9470909) her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 8, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00390Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 08, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk GALVESTON DIVISION MAERSK TANKERS MR K/S, § § Plaintiff. § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-00390 § M/T SWIFT WINCHESTER, in rem, § et al., § § Defendants. § OPINION AND ORDER1 Pending before me is a Motion to Disqualify Counsel, Strike Pleadings and Submit Documents to the Court In Camera filed by Defendant Winchester Shipping, Inc. (“Winchester”).2 See Dkt. 37. In that motion, Winchester seeks to disqualify the law firm of Schouest, Bamdas, Soshea, BenMaier & Eastham PLLC (“SBSB Eastham”) from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,017 Carl R. Duncan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Banc One Capital Partners Corp. v. KneipperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Employers Casualty Company v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re ProEducation Intern., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.