Legal Opinion

City of Fond Du Lac v. Kaehne

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 7, 1999No. 98-3619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Section 66.12(l)(b), Stats., clearly says "[a] court appearance is required for a violation of a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.63(1), [Stats.,]" the operating while intoxicated statute. In this case, Scott R. Kaehne claims that because he pled not guilty by mail, and because this procedure is contrary to § 66.12(l)(b), his not guilty plea was improperly entered and the ten-day period in which to request a jury trial has therefore not yet begun. We hold, however, that while it is true that a court appearance is necessary under the statute, a court appearance in a civil action may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Mattingly v. Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brunton v. NUVELL CREDIT CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Brunton v. NUVELL CREDIT CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API