Legal Opinion

Watts v. Ramos

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 1, 1996No. 95 C 3296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff McNeal Watts filed a complaint in forma pauperis against defendant Anthony Ramos under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Watts, an inmate at State-ville Correctional Center in Joliet, Illinois, claims that Ramos, who was then managing the prison’s segregation unit, violated Watts’ Eighth Amendment rights by depriving him of all recreation time for over a year, from March 6, 1995 through March 9, 1996. Watts seeks compensatoiy and punitive damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. Pending before the Court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Love v. Cook County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  2. Larry Craig v. D. Reagle Warden, et al.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API