Legal Opinion

Holt v. Alloway

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1827PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR to the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt, founded on the judgment of a Circuit Court of the state of Kentucky. The judgment is declared on as a matter of record, with a reference by the prout patet per recordum. The defendant pleaded, inter alia, that the judgment, if any, had been obtained against him on a recognizance of special bail for W. Alloway, without any notice having been served on the defendant; and without any capias ad satisfaciendum having been issued against the principal. There was a general demurrer to the plea, and judgment for the defendant:

This plea, though not technically drawn, maybe…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Bissell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Shumway v. StillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Aldrich v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bailey v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gunn v. PeakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Roberts v. LeutzkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Draggoo v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Ault v. ZeheringIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API