Kaemmerling v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The state conceding that under Williams v. State, ante, 341, an abatement of the entire tax should be decreed, the only question for consideration is whether interest from the time the tax was paid should be added to the amount to be abated.
Article 55 (56) of Part II of the Constitution prohibiting payments from the state treasury except in accordance with legislative act or resolve, as a practical declaration that the state cannot be sued without its consent, makes it evident that it is not liable for interest on its obligations without such consent. The obligation of itself does not imply…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Schlesinger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Ball v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- City of Franklin v. Coleman Bros.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.