Legal Opinion

Harry Coles v. Joshua Eagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2012No. 11-16471PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Harry J. Coles claims that defendants Joshua Eagle and Elton Robertson, officers of the Honolulu Police Department, used excessive force in arresting him. The officers moved for summary judgment, arguing that their conduct was reasonable and, in any event, that they were entitled to qualified immunity. Although Coles brought a single claim of excessive force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district court held on summary judgment that some of the officers’ actions were reasonable as a matter of law, but other parts of the encounter raised genuine issues of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Richard Leo Deorle v. Greg Rutherford, Butte County Deputy Sheriff Mick Grey, Butte County Sheriff County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Bryan v. MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Santos v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Michelle Cameron v. Michelle CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Wendy Browning v. Edmonson Cnty., Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. Hasmik Chinaryan v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Koiro v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. Rafael Gonzalez v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API