Legal Opinion

United States v. Langston

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 20, 1999No. ARMY 9700358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*515OPINION OF THE COURT

MERCK, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, of maltreatment of subordinates (two specifications), adultery, indecent assault, indecent exposure (two specifications), indecent language (three specifications), and obstruction of justice (two specifications), in violation of Articles 93 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 893 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by the military judge of maltreatment of a subordinate, indecent assault,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BentonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. LangstonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API