Legal Opinion
Carlone v. Adduci
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 11, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mikoll, J. P.
The primary question presented on this appeal is whether Supreme Court properly determined that plaintiff was the rightful owner entitled to possession of an automobile with an altered vehicle identification number (hereinafter VIN) held by the New York Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter the Department) as an unidentifiable vehicle pursuant to the provisions of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 423-a.
Plaintiff, a citizen of Quebec, Canada, purchased a used De Tomaso 874 Pantera automobile (hereinafter the Pantera) bearing the VIN THPNLK01142 from MRM Industries…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- First National Bank v. Mountain Food Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Time Motor Sales, Inc. v. Property Clerk of the Police DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Candela v. Port Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Carlone v. AdduciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Best Sound & Security, Inc. v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- DePasquale v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003