Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wambeke v. Hopkin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1962No. 3051Published

1DissentJustice Harnsberger

This court ’has previously held that a conveyance to two persons who are husband and wife at the time property vests in them creates an estate by entireties. Peters v. Dona, 49 Wyo. 306, 54 P.2d 817; Ward Terry and Company v. Hensen, 75 Wyo. 444, 297 P.2d 213; Amick v. Elwood, 77 Wyo. 269, 314 P.2d 944.

The essential characteristics of an estate by the entireties are: (1) It can occur only between husband and wife and because, in contemplation of law, they are one person; (2) each is seized of all and not by one-half, or by any other portion of the property, as, for instance, in the case of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Peters v. DonaWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. TERRY AND COMPANY v. HensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Amick v. ElwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bergman v. American National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API