Legal Opinion · Concurrence

James F. Humphreys & Associates, L.C. v. Board of Review

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2004No. 31731Published

1ConcurrenceAlbright, Justice

(Filed Dec. 6, 2004)

In a separate opinion concurring with the result in this case, my colleague, the distinguished Chief Justice Elliott E. Maynard, suggests that this Court should supplement the legislative definition of gross misconduct which disqualifies one from receiving unemployment benefits indefinitely. I write separately to express strong opposition to that proposal.

This Court explained in Dailey v. Board of Review, 214 W.Va. 419, 589 S.E.2d 797 (2003), that our Legislature has created two levels of disqualification for receipt of unemployment benefits because of misconduct, unlike…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission ex rel. Residential and Small Commercial Customers of Hope Gas, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bowling v. Ansted Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dailey v. Board of Review, West Virginia Bureau of Employment ProgramsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Gerver v. BenavidesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API