Legal Opinion

Breen v. Doyle

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 8, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtJames E. Mulcahy, J.

Motions numbered 19 and 24 have been considered together. In this action to recover damages for an alleged assault, mutual notices of examination before trial were served by the respective parties. In and by these motions which are now before the court, each party moves to vacate the notice of examination served by the other side.

In Siciliano v. Consolidated Edison Co. (204 Misc. 203) it was held that rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice was not intended to change the rule prevailing in the First Department that a general examination before trial is not allowed in an action to recover…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Siciliano v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API