Akron Canal & Hydraulic Co. v. Fontaine
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
Plaintiff, The Akron Canal & Hydraulic Company, brought this action against various parties, including a corporation and an executor, to recover a judgment restraining them “from keeping- for hire; boats, fishing tackle, fish bait and other fishing paraphernalia, for the purpose of letting the same to various and sundry persons for fishing in or boating upon the waters of * * * Fritch’s Lake, commonly known as Wingfoot Lake, unless permission first so to do is secured from the plaintiff ‘ The petition further prays for an accounting “of rents, profits and revenues obtained by the defendants *…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Baker v. Normanoch Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Keith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.