State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Thebarge
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 356 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS None of the proposed allegations called into question Fernando-Granados’ fault or culpability. Therefore, we find that, given the great weight of the evidence against Fernando- Granados, there was no ineffective assistance of counsel because there was no prejudice to Fernando-Granados’ case. CONCLUSION The trial court did not err in denying Fernando-Granados an evidentiary hearing because, given the great weight of the evidence against him, even finding the allegations true would not have been prejudicial to Fernando-Granados’ case. Affirmed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. WintroubNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. OF NEB. SUPREME COURT v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. SimmonsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. CoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. ChapinNebraska Supreme Court · 2005