Legal Opinion

Renwick v. New York Elevated Railroad

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided July 2, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from equity term. Action by James Renwick against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The judgment appealed from restrains the defendants from

maintaining or operating their elevated railroad in front of plaintiff’s premises Nos. 148, 150, 152, and 154 East Forty-Second street, unless within a time fixed by the judgment they produce proof satisfactory to the court that they caused the plaintiff’s easements appurtenant to said property to be condemned and acquired according to law prior to the date of the judgment. The judgment also awards past damages with respect to said property. It is now claimed that the trial judge erred in granting injunctive relief as to said property,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bergman v. Manhattan Railway Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
  2. Sears v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Domschke v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mead v. New York Elevated RailroadThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API