Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ward

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1929No. 779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice, J.

It is urged, as the first claim of error, that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer and in ordering said amendment. This contention, as we see it, is not now open to inquiry. The plaintiff did not elect not to further plead and did not permit final judgment to be entered on the demurrer and prosecute error therefrom, but to the contrary, he elected to amend his petition as ordered by the trial court. By doing so, plaintiff waived the claimed error. Bingham v. Nypano Railroad Company et al., 112 OS. 115.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence in chief, the trial court, over an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bingham v. Nypano Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coral Gables, Inc v. GarnOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Perry v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Allen v. Dayton Union Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Rounds v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API