Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lovelace v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1983No. 05-81-00804-CRPublished

1DissentSparling, Justice

I would hold that the prosecutor’s statement “you see the flesh hanging off their hands”1 is not error, or in the alternative, is at least harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. I therefore respectfully dissent.

The argument was made during the guilt/innocence phase of the trial. The record reveals that the only contested issue concerning guilt was whether or not the appellant was intoxicated at the time of the accident. The “hanging flesh” statement would not be germane to the issue of appellant’s intoxication. Further, appellant’s punishment was assessed by the court, and the court is presumed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Kimithi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Rhine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API