Yin v. Amino Products Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHart, J.
Unquestionably tbe acceptance of a check for a lesser sum on condition that it shall constitute a satisfaction of an unliquidated or disputed claim of greater amount, presently or past due, constitutes an accord and satisfaction. Here there is said to be a consideration for the release of tiie debt because of the uncertainty of its amount or because of uncertainty as to its validity. In this I fully agree with the majority opinion of this court.
But what must be the rule where the debtor tenders a check to his creditor conditioned that it shall be in full satisfaction of the latter’s…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Sheehy v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- McKenzie v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.