Doe v. NORWICH ROMAN CATHOLIC CORP.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jane Doe initiated this action in Connecticut Superior Court on November 18, 2008. The complaint alleges various claims brought under the federal RICO statute and under Connecticut state law. The Defendants were served on December 3, 2008. On December 17, 2008, Defendants Norwich Roman Catholic Corp., Bishop Daniel Reilly, and Monsignor Thomas Bride removed the case to the District of Connecticut, asserting that the Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiffs RICO claims and supplemental jurisdiction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joyce Jones, Martha L. Edwards, Lou Cooper and Vincent E. Jackson, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Edelman v. PageDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- SCX Holdings, LLC v. GjokaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025