Legal Opinion

Mudd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1990No. 16783Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is a proceeding for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On November 1, 1984 a jury found William Leslie (Bill) Mudd guilty of one count of kidnapping in violation of § 565.110, RSMo 1978, and five counts of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1983). Upon a finding that Mudd (defendant) was a prior and persistent offender, his punishment was fixed at imprisonment for thirty years on each count. It was ordered that the sentences be served consecutively. On direct appeal the judgments and sentences were affirmed. State v. Mudd, 703 S.W.2d 63 (Mo.App.1985).

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Mallett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. MuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. American Fence Co. of Midwest, Inc. v. SummersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API