Legal Opinion

Durham v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 28, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Benny Durham seeks to overturn his conviction of store-house breaking and consequent sentence of imprisonment for one year. KRS 433.190. Appellant Durham asserts that (1) he was entitled to a peremptory instruction of acquittal since the only evidence against him was uncorroborated evidence from accomplices, or (2) in any event, the trial court should have submitted to the jury whether certain prosecution witnesses were accomplices.

Appellant was jointly indicted with Ray Howell for breaking into the country store of Elmer Bullock at Eubank, with intent to steal therefrom.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Head v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  4. Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  2. Hammershoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  3. Dowdle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. Lefevers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hallmark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API