Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Pepper Pike v. Parker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 2001No. 78371Published

1DissentDyke, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the decision to reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings.

Stopping an automobile and detaining the occupants constitutes a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660. Thus, such stops must be reasonable in order to to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions. Id. A brief investigative stop is permitted if there is at least an articulable and reasonable suspicion that a motorist is subject to seizure for violation of law. Id. The officer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BrandenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. GullettOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. DrogiOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API