Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lyle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1917No. 4309Published

The opinion states the case.

1DissentPrehdergast, Judge

(dissenting).—Judge Harper in Ex parte Francis, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 304, 165 S. W. Rep., 147, and Ex parte Mode, 77 Texas Crim. Rep., 432, 180 S. W. Rep., 708, has so completely, both on reason and on authority, demonstrated the constitutionality of our pool hall law, it is entirely useless for me to again discuss the question. In my judgment, the opinions by him in those cases are unanswered and unanswerable. If my brethren are not convinced by those great opinions, and by the opinions of the great judges and courts of every other State in the United States cited by him, then “neither will…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Harris County v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lytle v. HalffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. State Ex Relator McNamara v. ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API