Legal Opinion

State v. Youngblood

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The trial court sustained a motion to quash an indictment, the material parts of which read as follows:

• The' Grand Jurors for the'State of Tennessee, good and lawful men, duly elected, impaneled, sworn and'charged to inquire for the body of the County of Wayne, and State aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, present: That Matt Youngblood heretofore, to *521wit: On the 30th day of October, 1954, in the State and Connty aforesaid did unlawfully aid and abet persons unknown to the Grand Jurors to sell beer'out-out of the corporate limits of any town at a certain' place of business known as Cypress…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Nashville Railway v. CrewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chapple v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stanley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Mendolia v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Willie DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. CuretonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. State v. ThorpeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  5. Smith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API