Legal Opinion

King v. Listman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1911No. 9248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 15, 1910, sustaining an order of the civil service commission confirming the dismissal of a member of a city’s police force.

1Per curiam

On- May 3, 1909, the city of Seattle, by ordinance, provided for a temporary increase in its police department to meet an emergency then existing. The ordinance provided for the appointment of one captain, three sergeants, and thirty-six patrolmen, to serve for a period of five months. One L. J. Stuart was appointed to the temporary captaincy so created, and served until about the middle of August, 1909, when,he was made a permanent captain of the police force. On August 20, 1909, the appellant, who was then a sergeant'on the regular police force, was appointed to fill the vacancy created by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Perry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Littau v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Beebe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Ford v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bridges v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API