Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Frenchee Chemical Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 6, 1941No. 1542PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the defendant to dismiss the complaint on the ground that.it does not set forth a claim upon which relief can be granted. In the alternative the defendant asks for summary judgment.
The plaintiff S. Rodman Boyd is the Pennsylvania administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of Ronald Mrozinski deceased who was nineteen months of age at the time of his death.
The plaintiffs Walter Mrozinski and Jennie Mrozinski are the parents of the decedent.
The complaint alleges that the defendant was the manufacturer and/or distributor of a product known…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- New York Eskimo Pie Corporation v. RatajCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Riff v. Morgan PharmacySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FeinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lauchert v. American S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
- Commonwealth v. FeinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.