Legal Opinion

Old Republic Insurance v. Prostran

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 10, 2014Published

1Opinion of the CourtHand, J.

In this case, appellants Sinisa Prostran and Amy Prostran (together, “Prostrans”) appeal the Plymouth District Court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment against appellee Old Republic Insurance Company (“Old Republic”). The sole basis for the Prostrans’ unsuccessful motion was their contention that Old Republic’s claims against them were governed by the two-year statute of limitations applicable under G.L.c. 244, §17A to certain actions related to mortgage foreclosures, rather than the six-year statute of limitations for contract actions, pursuant to G.L.c. 260, §2. For the reasons…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Salem State CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Pyle v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Commission v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Consumer Product Distributors, Inc. v. ElseidyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API