Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Nay

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1884No. 10,969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellee, Nay, sued appellant Reeder on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage and have a vendor’s lien declared against said Reeder and appellant Waterman Clift. Clift appeared and defended. A demurrer was overruled to the third paragraph of the complaint.

Appellant Clift answered in five paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the third paragraph of answer. A reply was filed in seven paragraphs. Demurrers were overruled to the second, third; sixth and seventh paragraphs of reply. There was a trial by the court, and a finding and judgment for the plaintiff. Clift appealed,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradway v. GroenendykeIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sponhaur v. MalloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Jouchert v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Borror v. CarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Mason v. DouglasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API