Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Charles Ronald McElroy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 17, 1981No. 79-2516Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGarth, Circuit Judge

I concur with the majority’s decision to vacate McElroy’s conviction and to enter a judgment of acquittal on Count II. I dis*282sent from the majority’s affirmance of McElroy’s convictions on Counts I and III.

I

The clarification of the requirements necessary to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2314 (1976) is of overriding concern in this case. In relevant part, § 2314 reads:

Whoever, with unlawful or fraudulent intent, transports in interstate or foreign commerce any falsely made, forged, altered, or counterfeited securities or tax stamp, knowing the same to have been falsely made, forged,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Billy Frank Newson, A/K/A Billy Moore, United States of America v. Frank Lee MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API