Legal Opinion

Louisiana Northwest R.R. Co. v. McMorella

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first contended by counsel for the defendant that the judgment should be reversed because the court erred in refusing to compel the plaintiff to make her complaint more definite and certain. The record shows that the defendant filed a motion to require the plaintiff to make her complaint more definite and certain, but that the motion was never acted upon by the court. It has been repeatedly held by this court that, unless a party secures a ruling on a demurrer, it will be presumed on appeal that the demurrer was abandoned. Kierman v. Blackwell, Admr.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. RowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Harbottle v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Bouldin v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Kiernan v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  5. Hobart-Lee Tie Co. v. KeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. North River Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Bosler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Lester v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Louisiana & Northwest Railroad v. McMorellaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API